U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) changed its guidance for Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) self-petitions on December 22, 2025. The update appears in Policy Alert PA-2025-33 and revises Volume 3, Part D of the USCIS Policy Manual.
The update applies to all VAWA Form I-360 self-petitions filed on or after December 22, 2025, as well as pending petitions. The guidance remains in effect as of September 2026.
The revised policy places greater importance on the timing of shared residence, primary documents, detailed affidavits, good moral character evidence, and the quality of proof submitted with the petition.
Why USCIS Issued the VAWA Policy Update
USCIS cited unprecedented filing trends as a basis for clarifying its VAWA guidance. According to the agency:
- VAWA self-petitions increased approximately 360% between fiscal years 2020 and 2024.
- Male self-petitioners increased approximately 259%.
- Parent self-petitioners increased approximately 2,239%.
The update does not eliminate the statutory protections available to survivors. It clarifies how USCIS will evaluate eligibility and evidence under existing law.
VAWA allows certain abused spouses, children, and parents of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents (LPRs) to file an immigration petition without the abuser’s knowledge or participation. The petition is filed using Form I-360, Petition for Amerasian, Widow(er), or Special Immigrant.
The Residency Requirement Has Changed
The most significant revision concerns residence with the abuser.
Under the revised interpretation, a self-petitioner must establish that they resided with the abuser during the qualifying relationship. This restores the pre-2022 interpretation of the requirement.
The prior policy permitted a self-petitioner to establish residence with the abuser at some point in the past, even if the shared residence did not occur during the qualifying relationship. USCIS no longer applies that broader interpretation to covered cases.
“Residence” means the self-petitioner’s general place of abode or principal, actual dwelling place. Occasional visits to the abuser’s home do not satisfy the requirement when the self-petitioner maintained a principal dwelling elsewhere.
USCIS does not require a specific duration of shared residence. The residence also does not have to occur in the United States. However, the evidence must connect the shared residence to the qualifying relationship.
VAWA Eligibility Requirements in 2026
A VAWA self-petitioner must establish each required element by a preponderance of the evidence. This means the evidence must show that eligibility is more likely than not.
The general requirements include:
-
Qualifying relationship. The self-petitioner must have a qualifying relationship to an abusive U.S. citizen or LPR as one of the following:
- Spouse, intended spouse, or former spouse.
- Child.
- Parent of a U.S. citizen son or daughter who is at least 21 years old.
-
Good-faith marriage. A self-petitioning spouse must establish that the marriage was entered into in good faith and not to evade immigration laws.
-
Battery or extreme cruelty. The self-petitioner must show battery or extreme cruelty during the qualifying relationship. A spouse may also qualify based on abuse inflicted on the spouse’s child in circumstances recognized by law.
-
Residence with the abuser. The self-petitioner must show that they resided with the abuser during the qualifying relationship.
-
Good moral character. The self-petitioner must establish good moral character under the applicable immigration standards.
-
Immigrant classification. The self-petitioner must qualify for immediate relative or family-preference classification.
Eligibility must continue from the time of filing through final adjudication. A change in circumstances after filing can affect eligibility in some cases.
Spouses Must Provide Stronger Good-Faith Marriage Evidence
For spousal VAWA self-petitions, USCIS now emphasizes primary evidence of the legal marriage and the parties’ marital history.
A strong filing should generally include:
- A legally valid marriage certificate.
- Evidence that all prior marriages of the self-petitioner were legally terminated.
- Evidence that all prior marriages of the abuser were legally terminated, when applicable.
- Evidence showing that the marriage was bona fide and entered into in good faith.
- Evidence showing the parties intended to establish a life together at the time of marriage.
Good-faith marriage evidence may include:
- Joint leases, deeds, mortgages, or rental agreements.
- Joint bank, credit card, or utility records.
- Insurance policies naming one spouse as a beneficiary.
- Tax filings or financial records.
- Evidence of courtship, wedding events, or shared experiences.
- Birth certificates of children.
- Police, medical, or court records identifying the relationship.
- Detailed affidavits from people with direct personal knowledge.
Separation or the end of the relationship does not, by itself, prove that the marriage was not entered into in good faith.
USCIS Retains Broad Authority to Evaluate Evidence
The “any credible evidence” standard remains in effect. A self-petitioner is not required to submit one specific document if that document is unavailable.
However, USCIS has sole discretion under INA § 204(a)(1)(J) and 8 CFR § 103.2(b)(2)(iii) to determine:
- Whether evidence is credible.
- Whether evidence is relevant and probative.
- How much weight each item receives.
- Whether the total record establishes eligibility.
USCIS generally gives greater weight to evidence that is:
- Detailed.
- Specific.
- Internally consistent.
- Reliable.
- Corroborated by independent records.
- Directly connected to the legal eligibility requirement.
A generalized affidavit may be credible but still carry limited weight if it does not identify specific facts, dates, locations, or events. Unsupported statements may not establish eligibility by a preponderance of the evidence.
USCIS may issue a Request for Evidence (RFE) or Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) when the filing lacks sufficient detail or probative evidence.
Good Moral Character Evidence Is More Important
The burden of proving good moral character rests with the self-petitioner. USCIS removed language stating that it would not deny a petition solely because the self-petitioner failed to submit certain good moral character evidence.
The self-petitioner’s affidavit remains primary evidence. It should provide detailed information about conduct and behavior relevant to good moral character. USCIS may give limited weight to an affidavit that is vague, conclusory, or unsupported.
Applicants should also review the applicable police clearance and criminal background check requirements. These may involve jurisdictions where the self-petitioner lived for six months or more during the three-year period before filing.
A self-petitioner with an arrest, charge, conviction, probation issue, or other criminal history should disclose the matter and provide relevant records. Failure to disclose information can affect both the good moral character determination and the credibility of the entire petition.
Extreme Cruelty Must Show Power or Control
USCIS clarified that hurtful conduct or adverse interactions of limited severity do not establish “extreme” cruelty. The conduct must be sufficiently serious under the totality of the circumstances.
The actions must reflect an intention to gain or maintain power and control over the self-petitioner. Evidence may address:
- Threats or threatened acts of violence.
- Forced confinement or isolation.
- Psychological or sexual abuse.
- Control over food, medical treatment, finances, housing, or communication.
- Threats involving immigration status.
- A pattern of coercive conduct.
- Police, medical, court, shelter, or counseling records.
There is no single required document and no fixed formula. USCIS evaluates the alleged conduct and supporting evidence on a case-by-case basis.
Special Rule for Step-Relationships After Death
The updated guidance also addresses step-relationships.
If the marriage that created the step-relationship ended because the biological or legal parent died, the self-petitioner must provide evidence that the relationship with the surviving abusive stepparent or stepchild continued after filing.
This requirement is separate from proving:
- The biological or legal parent-child relationship.
- The marriage that created the step-relationship.
- The required age and timing elements.
- The abuse and shared residence requirements.
Relevant evidence may include continued communication, financial support, household records, medical or school records, or detailed statements from people with direct knowledge of the ongoing relationship.
Evidence Checklist for a Stronger Form I-360 Filing
Survivors should organize evidence by each eligibility requirement. Potential evidence includes:
- Marriage, birth, adoption, divorce, annulment, or death certificates.
- Proof of the abuser’s U.S. citizenship or LPR status.
- Leases, rental records, deeds, or mortgage statements.
- Utility bills, insurance records, and household accounts.
- Joint bank statements, tax records, or financial documents.
- Police, medical, court, shelter, or protection-order records.
- School, employment, or government records showing a shared address.
- Detailed affidavits from the self-petitioner and third parties.
- Police clearances and criminal background checks.
- Documents explaining why unavailable primary evidence cannot be obtained.
Affidavits should identify the writer’s full name, address, contact information, relationship to the parties, and the specific facts personally observed. Dates, locations, names, and descriptions of events are essential.
Confidentiality Protections Remain in Place
The policy update does not eliminate VAWA confidentiality protections under 8 U.S.C. § 1367. These protections restrict the disclosure and use of information relating to protected VAWA cases.
Survivors should still exercise caution when communicating with USCIS, submitting documents, changing addresses, or requesting records. A safe address and secure method of communication are important parts of case planning.
Consult a VAWA Immigration Attorney Before Filing
The December 2025 policy update makes the initial Form I-360 filing more consequential. A case that does not clearly document shared residence during the qualifying relationship may face an RFE, NOID, or denial. A denial can affect future immigration options and may create serious legal consequences depending on the person’s status and circumstances.
Survivors should gather primary documents, prepare detailed affidavits, identify gaps in the evidence, and obtain legal advice before filing. An experienced immigration attorney can evaluate eligibility under the current USCIS guidance and develop an evidence strategy based on the specific facts.
Blasingame Law LLC provides personalized immigration representation backed by more than 30 years of experience in corporate and private immigration practice. Contact Blasingame Law LLC for a confidential case evaluation with an experienced immigration attorney. The firm can help you assess a potential VAWA self-petition, prepare Form I-360 evidence, and identify the next appropriate step under current immigration law.
