DHS Expands 9-11 Biometric Fee to H-1B and L-1 Extension Petitions: Compliance Guide for Covered Employers Effective September 9, 2026

DHS Expands 9-11 Biometric Fee to H-1B and L-1 Extension Petitions: Compliance Guide for Covered Employers Effective September 9, 2026

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has expanded the scope of the 9-11 Response and Biometric Entry-Exit Fee for certain H-1B and L-1 petitions.

Under the final rule published at 91 Federal Register 51360, the fee will apply to all covered-employer extension-of-stay petitions, including extensions filed by the same employer for the same employee. The rule becomes effective on September 9, 2026.

This change affects employers that rely heavily on H-1B, L-1A, and L-1B workers. Human resources departments, global mobility teams, and immigration counsel should review upcoming filings before the effective date.

What the DHS Final Rule Changes

The 9-11 Biometric Fee is not a new fee. Congress established it to support biometric entry and exit systems. The fee amounts remain:

  • $4,000 for H-1B petitions
  • $4,500 for L-1 petitions

The significant change concerns which petitions require payment.

Before this rule, the fee generally applied to:

  • Petitions requesting an initial grant of H-1B or L-1 status.
  • Petitions requesting a change of employer for an employee already in H-1B or L-1 status.

The fee generally did not apply when the same employer filed a routine extension for the same employee.

Beginning September 9, 2026, a covered employer must generally pay the applicable fee for all H-1B and L-1 extension-of-stay petitions. This includes an extension in which:

  • The employee remains with the same employer.
  • The employee continues in the same nonimmigrant classification.
  • The petition does not involve a change of employer.

The rule amends 8 C.F.R. § 106.2(c)(8) and (9) to reflect this broader application.

Which Employers Are Covered?

The fee applies only to a “covered employer.” An employer is covered when both of the following conditions apply:

  1. The employer employs 50 or more employees in the United States.
  2. More than 50 percent of the employer’s U.S. workforce, counted in the aggregate, holds H-1B, L-1A, or L-1B nonimmigrant status.

The calculation combines H-1B, L-1A, and L-1B employees. Employers do not evaluate each classification separately for purposes of the 50-percent threshold.

Example

An employer has 80 employees in the United States:

  • 30 H-1B employees
  • 15 L-1A employees
  • 5 L-1B employees
  • 30 employees in other classifications

The employer has 50 employees in the covered classifications. Because 50 of 80 employees are in H-1B or L-1 status, the employer exceeds the 50-percent threshold and is a covered employer.

An employer that has 50 or more U.S. employees but does not exceed the 50-percent threshold is not subject to this fee based on the rule’s covered-employer definition.

Employers should document the calculation used to determine covered-employer status. Workforce composition may change because of hiring, termination, transfers, status changes, and organizational restructuring.

Passports and immigration documents representing H-1B, L-1, and employment-based immigration filings

Which Petitions Require the Fee?

For a covered employer, the fee generally applies to the following petitions:

  • H-1B petitions requesting an initial grant of status.
  • L-1 petitions requesting an initial grant of status.
  • H-1B change-of-employer petitions.
  • L-1 change-of-employer petitions.
  • H-1B extension-of-stay petitions.
  • L-1 extension-of-stay petitions.
  • Same-employer extensions for employees who remain in valid H-1B or L-1 status.

The fee continues to apply to petitions that involve an extension and a change of employer. The new rule adds same-employer extensions to the categories subject to payment.

Amended Petitions Without an Extension Request

An amended petition that does not seek an extension of the employee’s currently authorized H-1B or L-1 status is exempt from the 9-11 Biometric Fee.

Employers should distinguish between:

  • An amended petition that reports a material change but does not request additional time in H-1B or L-1 status; and
  • An amended petition that also requests an extension of the employee’s authorized status.

The first category is exempt under the amended regulation. The second category generally requires payment if the petitioner is a covered employer.

This distinction requires careful review of the purpose of the Form I-129 filing. Misclassifying the petition may result in a rejected or delayed filing.

Effective Date and Sunset Date

The final rule is effective on September 9, 2026. DHS has stated that the expanded fee requirement applies to relevant petitions filed on or after the effective date. It does not apply retroactively to petitions filed before that date, including petitions that were already pending before implementation.

The fee provisions apply to petitions filed on or before September 30, 2027, which is the current statutory sunset date.

Employers should not assume that an extension prepared before September 9 will avoid the fee. The filing date is material. Internal approval, document collection, or preparation of the petition does not replace the filing date for purposes of determining whether the expanded fee applies.

Who Pays the Fee?

The petitioning employer is responsible for paying the 9-11 Biometric Fee. The employee does not pay the fee directly.

For H-1B workers, employers must also account for wage and fee restrictions under federal law. H-1B employers are generally prohibited from recouping required petition-related filing fees by reducing the worker’s wages or compensation package. Employers must continue to comply with the required wage obligations, including payment of the greater of the applicable prevailing wage or the employer’s actual wage for similarly qualified workers.

Employers should obtain legal advice before attempting to allocate any immigration-related cost to an employee. A cost-allocation policy that conflicts with H-1B wage requirements may create additional compliance exposure.

Financial Impact for Covered Employers

The expanded fee may materially increase the cost of maintaining an existing foreign-national workforce.

For example:

  • Five H-1B extensions may add $20,000 in 9-11 Biometric Fees.
  • Five L-1 extensions may add $22,500.
  • A combination of five H-1B and five L-1 extensions may add $42,500.

These amounts are separate from other required filing fees, legal fees, premium processing fees, and costs associated with supporting documentation.

DHS estimates that the rule will increase transfer payments from H-1B and L-1 petitioners by approximately:

  • $37.9 million in fiscal year 2026
  • $40.0 million in fiscal year 2027

DHS attributes the increase primarily to extending the fee to same-employer extension petitions.

Required Compliance Steps for Employers

Employers should begin preparing for the effective date. The following steps are appropriate for HR, legal, finance, and global mobility teams.

1. Determine Whether the Employer Meets the Threshold

Calculate:

  • The total number of U.S. employees.
  • The number of employees in H-1B, L-1A, and L-1B status.
  • The percentage represented by those classifications in the aggregate.

Retain the data and methodology used for the calculation. The analysis should be updated when the employer’s workforce changes.

2. Audit Upcoming Extension Filings

Review all H-1B and L-1 matters scheduled for filing on or after September 9, 2026. Include:

  • Same-employer H-1B extensions.
  • Same-employer L-1A extensions.
  • Same-employer L-1B extensions.
  • Change-of-employer petitions.
  • Amended petitions that also request an extension of status.

Employers should identify which cases require the $4,000 or $4,500 fee before the filing package is finalized.

3. Update Budgets and Approval Procedures

Finance and procurement teams should update immigration budgets to account for the additional cost. Internal approval forms should separately identify:

  • Standard government filing fees.
  • The 9-11 Biometric Fee.
  • Premium processing fees.
  • Legal fees and other case expenses.

A fee omitted from the filing package may result in rejection or delay.

4. Coordinate With Immigration Counsel

The covered-employer analysis and petition classification should be reviewed with an experienced business immigration attorney. Counsel can evaluate whether the petition seeks an extension of status and whether an amended filing qualifies for the exemption.

The analysis is particularly important for employers with complex corporate structures, shared services organizations, staffing arrangements, or frequent transfers between related entities.

5. Review Workforce Compliance Policies

The fee expansion does not replace existing obligations. Employers must continue to comply with:

  • Form I-9 requirements.
  • H-1B Labor Condition Application obligations.
  • Required wage rules.
  • Material-change filing requirements.
  • L-1 qualifying-relationship and “doing business” requirements.
  • Petition documentation and recordkeeping standards.

A review of workforce compliance and internal I-9 procedures can help identify broader risks before a government review.

Professional HR and legal personnel reviewing employment authorization and workforce compliance documents

How Blasingame Law LLC Can Assist

The September 9, 2026 effective date creates an immediate planning issue for employers filing H-1B and L-1 petitions. Covered employers must evaluate workforce composition, identify affected extensions, and include the correct fee with each filing.

Blasingame Law LLC provides business immigration solutions for employers hiring, retaining, and transferring foreign employees. The firm assists with H-1B petitions, the L-1 visa and intracompany transfer visa, HR immigration procedures, and workforce compliance matters.

Employers should consult an experienced immigration lawyer before filing any H-1B or L-1 extension after September 9, 2026. Contact Blasingame Law LLC or schedule a consultation to assess whether your organization meets the covered-employer threshold and to plan upcoming extension filings.

Immigration attorney providing professional guidance on business immigration and workforce compliance

Tags :

Share post :

Related

No Content Available

Related

No Content Available
Isabel Guevara

Isabel Guevara

Immigration Paralegal
First generation Mexican American and Colorado native. AILA Affiliated Paralegal with over 10 years of experience navigating the ever-changing world of immigration. I work to create relationships with individuals, families, and companies, streamline workflow to compile strong evidence in support of clients’ applications and petitions, and successfully lead clients to approvals. My experience includes both family-based and employment-based cases. Working through numerous government websites and filing applications both electronically and on paper. Monitoring open cases throughout each phase and communication with clients. Maintaining office efficiency. When I’m not in the office, you can find me traveling the world, eating great food, and spending time with the people I love.
Addy Blasingame-Marchitell

Addy Blasingame-Marchitell

Chief Comfort Officer (CCO)
Addy is experienced in emotional support, security, and acting door bell duty. She loves people and spreading joy, laughter, and corgi “glitter” where ever she wanders. When she is not on duty at the law firm she practices her herding skills, chasing and catching tennis balls, organizes stuff-animal tug-o-war, and plays keep away with her human and canine friends.
Amber L. Blasingame Business Immigration Lawyer Colorado Springs, Business Immigration Solutions, Family Immigration Lawyer Colorado Springs

Amber L. Blasingame

Managing Attorney

Ms. Blasingame’s practice is focused on immigration law in business, worksite compliance, family, and humanitarian matters. She has worked in immigration law since 1995 in both corporate and law firm settings, including managing the employer compliance program and immigration team in the US and Canada for one of the “Big 4” account firms’ multi-national consulting practice. She has worked with individuals and employers of all sizes, public and private, on strategies for workforce migration and compliance, family unity, and humanitarian needs, temporary and permanent. Ms. Blasingame has successfully represented clients before the US Departments of Labor, State, Justice, and Homeland Security. Ms. Blasingame has written and edited articles and presented on various topics in immigration law. She earned her JD from the University of Denver, Sturm College of Law, in 2010, where she was a senior staff editor on the Denver University Law Review, participated in the DU asylum clinic, and received a scholastic excellence award in advanced immigration law. She earned her BA in English with minors in Communication Arts and French from Allegheny College in Meadville, PA. Ms. Blasingame is a member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), Colorado Women’s Bar Association, and the El Paso County Bar Association in Colorado.